Closing Arguments Near End In Jackson Lawsuit - Boston News, Weather, Sports | FOX 25 | MyFoxBoston

Closing Arguments Near End In Jackson Lawsuit

Posted: Updated:
Los Angeles, CA -

(FOX 11 / AP) The company producing Michael Jackson's "This Is It" comeback concerts was a money-making machine run by executives who did not care about the star's well-being, a lawyer told jurors Thursday.

Attorney Brian Panish used his rebuttal argument in the negligence case to urge the jury to find that AEG Live hired Dr. Conrad Murray to be Jackson's physician without considering whether he was fit for the job.

Murray was convicted in 2011 of involuntary manslaughter after giving Jackson an overdose of the anesthetic propofol as a sleep aid as Jackson fought chronic insomnia.

The case is expected to go to the jury later in the day.

Panish focused on emails between AEG executives referring to Jackson wanting Murray to care for him during the concerts in London. He also showed jurors details of a contract drafted by AEG but only signed by Murray. He said it proved that AEG wanted to control the doctor.

The contention came a day after a lawyer for AEG Live told jurors that Jackson was the architect of his own demise and no one else can be blamed. Defense attorney Marvin Putnam said Jackson insisted on hiring the cardiologist, despite objections from AEG Live.

The company told Jackson there were great doctors in London but the singer would not be deterred, Putnam said.

"It was his money and he certainly wasn't going to take no for an answer," he said, explaining Murray was secretly giving the star intravenous doses of propofol, a drug not meant to be used outside operating rooms.

Putnam portrayed AEG Live and its executives as victims of deception by Jackson and Murray. He showed brief excerpts from the "This Is It" documentary to show that Jackson appeared in top form just 12 hours before he died.

"AEG Live did not have a crystal ball," he said. "Dr. Murray and Mr. Jackson fooled everyone. They want to blame AEG for something no one saw."

If AEG Live had known about the propofol treatments, it would have pulled the plug on the planned tour, the lawyer said.

"AEG would have never agreed to finance this tour if they knew Mr. Jackson was playing Russian roulette in his bedroom every night," Putnam told jurors.

Putnam repeatedly referred to the 50-year-old Jackson as a grown man capable of making his own health care decisions, contradicting Panish's descriptions of him as a perpetual "Peter Pan."

If jurors find AEG didn't hire Murray, their work will be done quickly and they need not decide other questions involving damages.

Still, he Putnam reviewed the damage issues, ridiculing the plaintiffs for once saying they wanted $1.5 billion from the concert giant.

He said that figure was based on expert witness speculation on how much Jackson could have earned if he lived a long time and continued to perform. But he asserted that damages cannot be based on speculation.

A unanimous verdict is not required in the case. Only nine of the 12 jurors must agree.


From Phil Shuman:

It's tough to sum up five months of a complex trial , but when it comes to "Katherine Jackson vs AEG Live‘' as this civil lawsuit is officially known, it seems that the plaintiff's side has appealed more to emotion, about Michael being  a troubled genius being forced to make money for the greedy corporate giant at great peril to his fragile health....while the defense has relied on what it says are facts that show they shouldn't be held responsible for hiring Dr Conrad Murray.  AEG says Murray  was clearly Michael's choice and had treated him and his children long before the ‘‘This Is It Tour'‘ was even planned.    Murray of course if the cardiologist who apparently decided he could practice anesthesia in a bedroom  and was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the June 2009 propofol overdose death of the man his family's attorney called ‘‘the greatest entertainer of all time'.   

The key question for the 6 man, 6 woman jury to decide, first of all, is who actually hired Dr Murray.  If it was AEG, as the Jackson's claim, and they were negligent in hiring him, checking him out , and supervising him, then the family could get hundreds of millions, maybe more in damages... The Jacksons claim of 1.5 billion in lost income was ridiculed as ‘ridiculous' by the defense. If the jury rules that it was Michael that hired Dr Murray, which is what AEG has said from the beginning, case over, Jacksons lose and presumably head back to Calabasas to ponder a future without Michael's fortune to support them .

There's been evidence that supports both points of view.. in the times I've been in court... so it's not going to be a quick or simple deliberation, in my estimation .  ( Though my record on predicting jury behavior, like most people's, is mixed ).   And remember, it's a civil case.. 9 out of 12....'‘easier'' in a sense than a unanimous verdict required in a criminal trial.  Hope we can talk w/ jurors if and when it's over.  Sometimes they want to talk, sometimes they don‘t.   As they say... ‘‘stay tuned ‘'....  

Follow me on Twitter: @foxphil

Powered by WorldNow

25 FOX Drive
Dedham, MA 02026

Phone (781) 467-2525

Didn't find what you were looking for?
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Fox Television Stations, Inc. and Worldnow. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Ad Choices